Content
Archives
- August 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (15)
- May 2010 (15)
- April 2010 (23)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (22)
- November 2009 (19)
- October 2009 (27)
- September 2009 (21)
- August 2009 (17)
- July 2009 (36)
- June 2009 (29)
- May 2009 (9)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (118)
- February 2009 (120)

The decline of professional photography
The NY Times takes a small shot at what’s been going on with the evolution of digital photography technology and its impact on the industry. Sites like Flickr have been a massive source for Getty since they opened up their users’ images for licensing; photographers, assistants, and digital technicians alike are finding it more difficult to maintain the same day rates; costs are still soaring (and the pay rates still haven’t increased for shit in decades — unless you count the paltry online royalties that get tacked on to the day rate nowadays); and there’s a bunch of artists out there (me) hungry for some work but don’t have (m)any opportunities.
When you have such affordable digital technology, why would anyone pay a working photographer their day rate when you can just bust out your 15-megapixel dSLR camera and do it yourself? I’ve been trying to figure that out since I finished school and it remains to be seen if any of my attempts at an alternative business model will prove any success.